Writs and Judicial Review: Types, Scope, and Limitations
July 19, 2026
Writs and Judicial Review: Types, Scope, and Limitations
Introduction
Writs are constitutional remedies issued by courts to enforce fundamental rights. They form the bedrock of judicial review in India, empowering the Supreme Court (Article 32) and High Courts (Article 226) to protect citizens against arbitrary state action. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called Article 32 the "heart and soul of the Constitution."
Constitutional Basis
Article 32 — Right to Constitutional Remedies
Remedy for enforcement of Fundamental Rights (Part III)
Can be suspended only when a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation (Article 359)
Supreme Court can issue writs for Fundamental Right violations
Not an absolute right — reasonable restrictions apply
Article 226 — Power of High Courts
Wider than Article 32 — High Courts can issue writs for Fundamental Rights and other legal rights
Territorial jurisdiction limited to the state(s) under the High Court's purview
Discretionary remedy — High Court may refuse if alternative remedy exists
Five Types of Writs
1. Habeas Corpus ("You May Have the Body")
Purpose: Produce a detained person before the court to examine legality of detention
Who can file: Detainee or any person on their behalf
Against: Both state and private individuals (unlawful detention)
Not available: When detention is lawful, contempt of court, or before a competent court
Key feature: Summary procedure — court decides without detailed evidence
2. Mandamus ("We Command")
Purpose: Command a public official to perform a statutory duty
Who can file: Person with a legal right who has sought performance of duty
Against: Public authorities, tribunals, corporations, inferior courts
Not available against: President/Governor, private individuals, discretionary duties, or when alternative remedy exists
3. Prohibition ("To Forbid")
Purpose: Prevent inferior courts/tribunals from exceeding jurisdiction
Nature: Preventive writ — issued during proceedings, not after
Direction: From higher court to lower court/tribunal
4. Certiorari ("To Be Certified")
Purpose: Quash an order already passed by an inferior court/tribunal
Nature: Corrective writ — issued after a decision has been made
Grounds: Error of law, excess of jurisdiction, violation of natural justice
Purpose: Challenge the legal authority of a person holding a public office
Who can file: Any citizen, even without personal interest
Effect: Removes usurper from office; determines title to office
Judicial Review: Scope
Constitutional supremacy: Constitution is the supreme law; laws inconsistent with it are void
Three dimensions: Review of legislative action (constitutional amendments), executive action, and judicial decisions
Doctrine of basic structure (Kesavananda Bharati, 1973): Parliament cannot amend the basic features
Articles 13, 32, 131-136, 143, 226, 227, 246, 251, 254, 372 — all enable review in some form
Limitations on Writs and Judicial Review
Locus standi: Generally only aggrieved persons can approach courts (exceptions via PIL)
Alternative remedy: Courts may refuse if adequate statutory remedy exists
Laches (delay): Unreasonable delay may disentitle relief
Res judicata: A matter already decided cannot be re-litigated
Political questions: Courts avoid policy/long-term planning decisions
Emergency provisions: Article 359 can suspend Article 32 enforcement
Key Supreme Court Judgments
Case
Significance
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976)
Habeas Corpus suspended during Emergency — later overruled
Kesavananda Bharati (1973)
Basic structure doctrine — limits amending power
S.P. Gupta v. UOI (1981)
Expanded locus standi — PIL
L. Chandra Kumar (1997)
Articles 32/226 cannot be excluded even by constitutional amendment
I.R. Coelho (2007)
Laws placed in Ninth Schedule subject to basic structure review
Conclusion
Writs and judicial review are essential mechanisms ensuring constitutional supremacy and protecting fundamental rights. While their scope in India is broader than in many common law jurisdictions, limitations ensure they are not misused. A balanced approach — respecting judicial discipline while expanding access to justice — defines the Indian model.
Practice Questions
Discuss the scope of Article 32 vis-à-vis Article 226. Why is the High Court's writ jurisdiction considered wider?
Explain the writ of Quo Warranto. How does it differ from other writs?
"Judicial review is the heart of constitutionalism." Critically examine with reference to Indian Constitution.