UPSC Margin
NotesTestsDaily CACSAT
UPSC Margin

Analytical concept notes, daily current affairs, and mock tests for serious UPSC aspirants.

Learn

  • Notes
  • Daily Current Affairs
  • Mock Tests
  • CSAT
  • Strategy Guide

Resources

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • RSS Feed

Support

  • Help & FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Telegram Community

© 2026 UPSC Margin. All rights reserved.

Operated by Satyam Raj · hello@upscmargin.com

Back to Notes
PolityFree till Sep 9

Writs and Judicial Review: Types, Scope, and Limitations

July 19, 2026

Writs and Judicial Review: Types, Scope, and Limitations

Introduction

Writs are constitutional remedies issued by courts to enforce fundamental rights. They form the bedrock of judicial review in India, empowering the Supreme Court (Article 32) and High Courts (Article 226) to protect citizens against arbitrary state action. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar called Article 32 the "heart and soul of the Constitution."

Constitutional Basis

Article 32 — Right to Constitutional Remedies

  • Remedy for enforcement of Fundamental Rights (Part III)
  • Can be suspended only when a Proclamation of Emergency is in operation (Article 359)
  • Supreme Court can issue writs for Fundamental Right violations
  • Not an absolute right — reasonable restrictions apply

Article 226 — Power of High Courts

  • Wider than Article 32 — High Courts can issue writs for Fundamental Rights and other legal rights
  • Territorial jurisdiction limited to the state(s) under the High Court's purview
  • Discretionary remedy — High Court may refuse if alternative remedy exists

Five Types of Writs

1. Habeas Corpus ("You May Have the Body")

  • Purpose: Produce a detained person before the court to examine legality of detention
  • Who can file: Detainee or any person on their behalf
  • Against: Both state and private individuals (unlawful detention)
  • Not available: When detention is lawful, contempt of court, or before a competent court
  • Key feature: Summary procedure — court decides without detailed evidence

2. Mandamus ("We Command")

  • Purpose: Command a public official to perform a statutory duty
  • Who can file: Person with a legal right who has sought performance of duty
  • Against: Public authorities, tribunals, corporations, inferior courts
  • Not available against: President/Governor, private individuals, discretionary duties, or when alternative remedy exists

3. Prohibition ("To Forbid")

  • Purpose: Prevent inferior courts/tribunals from exceeding jurisdiction
  • Nature: Preventive writ — issued during proceedings, not after
  • Direction: From higher court to lower court/tribunal

4. Certiorari ("To Be Certified")

  • Purpose: Quash an order already passed by an inferior court/tribunal
  • Nature: Corrective writ — issued after a decision has been made
  • Grounds: Error of law, excess of jurisdiction, violation of natural justice

Read Next

More in Polity

Delimitation Commission: Process, Issues, and Impact on Federalism

Governor: Powers, Discretion, and Controversies

AMRUT: Urban Infrastructure and Water Supply

5. Quo Warranto ("By What Authority")

  • Purpose: Challenge the legal authority of a person holding a public office
  • Who can file: Any citizen, even without personal interest
  • Effect: Removes usurper from office; determines title to office

Judicial Review: Scope

  • Constitutional supremacy: Constitution is the supreme law; laws inconsistent with it are void
  • Three dimensions: Review of legislative action (constitutional amendments), executive action, and judicial decisions
  • Doctrine of basic structure (Kesavananda Bharati, 1973): Parliament cannot amend the basic features
  • Articles 13, 32, 131-136, 143, 226, 227, 246, 251, 254, 372 — all enable review in some form

Limitations on Writs and Judicial Review

  • Locus standi: Generally only aggrieved persons can approach courts (exceptions via PIL)
  • Alternative remedy: Courts may refuse if adequate statutory remedy exists
  • Laches (delay): Unreasonable delay may disentitle relief
  • Res judicata: A matter already decided cannot be re-litigated
  • Political questions: Courts avoid policy/long-term planning decisions
  • Emergency provisions: Article 359 can suspend Article 32 enforcement

Key Supreme Court Judgments

CaseSignificance
ADM Jabalpur v. Shivkant Shukla (1976)Habeas Corpus suspended during Emergency — later overruled
Kesavananda Bharati (1973)Basic structure doctrine — limits amending power
S.P. Gupta v. UOI (1981)Expanded locus standi — PIL
L. Chandra Kumar (1997)Articles 32/226 cannot be excluded even by constitutional amendment
I.R. Coelho (2007)Laws placed in Ninth Schedule subject to basic structure review

Conclusion

Writs and judicial review are essential mechanisms ensuring constitutional supremacy and protecting fundamental rights. While their scope in India is broader than in many common law jurisdictions, limitations ensure they are not misused. A balanced approach — respecting judicial discipline while expanding access to justice — defines the Indian model.

Practice Questions

  1. Discuss the scope of Article 32 vis-à-vis Article 226. Why is the High Court's writ jurisdiction considered wider?
  2. Explain the writ of Quo Warranto. How does it differ from other writs?
  3. "Judicial review is the heart of constitutionalism." Critically examine with reference to Indian Constitution.