UPSC Margin
NotesTestsDaily CACSAT
UPSC Margin

Analytical concept notes, daily current affairs, and mock tests for serious UPSC aspirants.

Learn

  • Notes
  • Daily Current Affairs
  • Mock Tests
  • CSAT
  • Strategy Guide

Resources

  • About
  • Pricing
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • RSS Feed

Support

  • Help & FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Telegram Community

© 2026 UPSC Margin. All rights reserved.

Operated by Satyam Raj · hello@upscmargin.com

Back to Notes
PolityFree till Sep 9

Supreme Court of India: Powers, Jurisdiction, and Judicial Activism

July 19, 2026

TOPIC CLASSIFICATION

Subject: Polity | Topic: Judiciary Sub-topic: Supreme Court — Jurisdiction (Original, Appellate, Advisory), Judicial Review, Judicial Activism Prelims Focus: Article 124–147, writ jurisdiction, types of jurisdiction, contempt power Mains Focus: Judicial activism vs judicial restraint, collegium system, appointment of judges (NJAC controversy), PIL

EXAMINER REASONING

The Supreme Court is the highest judicial forum and guardian of the Constitution. UPSC Prelims tests specific articles on jurisdiction (Art. 131, 132–136, 143) and contempt powers. Mains questions critically analyse the role of judicial activism, the collegium vs NJAC debate, and the limits of judicial review under the basic structure doctrine.

Core Concept

The Supreme Court of India was established on January 28, 1950, under Article 124. It is the apex constitutional court with original, appellate, and advisory jurisdiction.

Composition and Appointment

AspectDetail
StrengthChief Justice of India (CJI) + 34 judges (total 35 including CJI)
AppointmentBy President — CJI and judges appointed on recommendation of Collegium (CJI + 4 senior-most SC judges)
Eligibility (Art. 124(3))5 years as HC judge, or 10 years as advocate in HC, or distinguished jurist
TenureUp to 65 years of age
RemovalImpeachment under Art. 124(4) — by each House with 2/3rd majority (proved misbehaviour/incapacity)

Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court

Read Next

More in Polity

Delimitation Commission: Process, Issues, and Impact on Federalism

Governor: Powers, Discretion, and Controversies

AMRUT: Urban Infrastructure and Water Supply

JurisdictionArticleDetails
OriginalArt. 131Centre-state disputes, state-state disputes (exclusive)
WritArt. 32Enforce Fundamental Rights — original jurisdiction for writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Quo Warranto, Certiorari, Prohibition)
Appellate (Civil)Art. 133Appeal from HC if substantial question of law
Appellate (Criminal)Art. 134Appeal from HC in certain criminal cases (death penalty, etc.)
Special Leave Petition (SLP)Art. 136Discretionary power to grant special leave to appeal from any court/tribunal
AdvisoryArt. 143President may seek SC opinion on any question of law or fact
ContemptArt. 129Supreme Court is a court of record — power to punish for contempt
ReviewArt. 137Can review its own judgments

Key Facts

  • Guardian of the Constitution: Exercises judicial review (Art. 13, 32, 131–136, 143, 226, 227).
  • Basic Structure Doctrine: Kesavananda Bharati (1973) — Parliament cannot amend the basic structure of the Constitution.
  • Article 32 is itself a Fundamental Right — "heart and soul of the Constitution" (B.R. Ambedkar).
  • Collegium System: Evolved through Three Judges Cases (1981, 1993, 1998).
  • NJAC Act (2014): Constitutional amendment (99th) to replace collegium with NJAC; struck down by SC in 2015 (4th Judges Case) as violative of basic structure.
  • Pendency: Over 85,000 cases pending in SC as of 2025.

PYQ Table

YearQuestionMarks
2023"Judicial activism has expanded the scope of judicial review in India." Critically analyse.15
2022Which Article gives the Supreme Court the power to punish for contempt? (Prelims)2
2021"The NJAC Act was a significant attempt at judicial reform." Discuss why it was struck down.12
2020Which of the following cases established the basic structure doctrine? (Prelims)2
2019Original jurisdiction of SC is under — (Prelims)2

Statement Elimination Guide

  1. "The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in all disputes." → False. Original jurisdiction under Art. 131 is only for federal disputes (Centre-state, state-state).
  2. "Article 32 is a Fundamental Right." → True. Right to move SC for enforcement of FRs is itself a FR.
  3. "The Collegium system was established by a constitutional amendment." → False. Evolved through judicial interpretations (Three Judges Cases); NJAC was the statutory/constitutional attempt.
  4. "Advisory opinion under Article 143 is binding on the SC." → False. The SC may refuse to give an opinion; and even if given, it is not binding (though has persuasive value).

Current Affairs Hook

  • 2025: SC sets guidelines for Governor's bill assent — constitutional limits defined.
  • 2024: Same-sex marriage judgment — SC refuses to recognise marriage equality but affirms LGBTQ+ rights.
  • 2023: Article 370 abrogation upheld by 5-judge bench.
  • 2022: SC Collegium resumes meetings; 5 new judges appointed.
  • 2021: SC expunges remarks against CJI — judges' accountability debate.
  • 2020: SC hears suo motu cases during COVID — migrant workers, oxygen supply.
  • 2019: Ayodhya verdict — SC settles Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title suit under Art. 136 (SLP).

Interlinkages

  • Executive: Appointment of judges (Collegium vs NJAC) — tense relationship.
  • Legislature: Parliament can amend laws but cannot alter basic structure (Kesavananda Bharati).
  • Federalism: Art. 131 — original jurisdiction protects federal balance.
  • Fundamental Rights: Art. 32 — SC as "sentinel on the qui vive" (protector of FRs).
  • Judicial Activism: PIL (since 1980s) — SC has expanded its role to environment, corruption, governance.
  • Tribunals: Art. 323A/B — SC can hear appeals from tribunals.
  • Article 142: SC can pass any order to do "complete justice" — extraordinary power used in Ayodhya, Union Carbide.
  • Alternate Dispute Resolution: Art. 136 SLP is not an appeal right but a discretionary remedy.

Common Mistakes

  • Confusing Original Jurisdiction (Art. 131 — federal disputes) with Writ Jurisdiction (Art. 32 — FR enforcement) — both are original but different bases.
  • Thinking Supreme Court can review its judgments under Art. 137 only — also curative petition (Rupa Ashok Hurra, 2002).
  • Believing SLP under Art. 136 is an appeal of right — it is discretionary.
  • Missing that advisory opinion under Art. 143 is not binding (though it becomes law in effect).
  • Assuming the SC has the power to amend the Constitution — no; only judicial review of amendments.

Revision Snapshot

JurisdictionArticleScope
Original (Federal)131Centre-state disputes
Writ32FR enforcement
Appellate (Civil)133Substantial question of law
Appellate (Criminal)134Death penalty, HC reversal of acquittal
SLP136Discretionary appeal
Advisory143President's reference
Contempt129Court of record
Review137Review of own judgment

Source Notes

  • Constitution of India – Articles 124–147 (Supreme Court)
  • Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
  • S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994)
  • Three Judges Cases (1981, 1993, 1998)
  • NJAC Judgment — Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record v. Union of India (2015)
  • Law Commission Reports – No. 229 (Speedy Trials), No. 245 (Arrears in Judiciary)
  • D.D. Basu – Comparative Constitutional Law
  • PRS India – Judicial Pendency Reports (2025)